CRYPTAGION — Post-Quantum Security
Comparison

CRYPTAGION vs open-source CBOM tools

Open-source CBOM tooling is genuinely useful — and CRYPTAGION is built on the same open standards (CycloneDX 1.6) and even open-source engines under the hood. The honest difference is not “inventory or not.” It is what happens after the inventory.

Open-source CBOM tools generate a cryptographic inventory. CRYPTAGION turns that inventory into a defensible migration decision: risk score, regulatory evidence, board report, and migration waves.

Side by side

CapabilityOpen-source CBOM toolingCRYPTAGION
Cryptographic inventoryYesYes
CycloneDX 1.6 CBOM outputYes (open standard)Yes
Code + certificates + live TLS in one passUsually single-source / DIY glueCombined
Per-asset quantum-risk scoringNo — inventory onlyYes
Harvest-now-decrypt-later (HNDL) exposureNoPer-asset lifetime
Board-ready executive report (PDF)NoYes
Wave-based migration roadmap (with effort)NoYes
Regulatory mapping (DORA, NIS2, CRA, FIPS)NoYes
On-prem / air-gapped executionYes (runs locally)Yes
Setup & expertise requiredYou assemble & maintain itDelivered as an engagement
Support & accountabilityCommunityNamed practitioner · SLA on Platform
CostFree (your time)Paid engagement

When to use which (honestly)

Open-source is the right call when…

You have the in-house cryptography expertise and the time, you mainly need a raw inventory, and you are comfortable assembling and maintaining the tooling yourself. It is free and capable.

CRYPTAGION makes sense when…

You need the inventory and the decision layer — risk-scored, regulator-mapped, board-readable, with a prioritised migration plan — delivered fast, with a named owner accountable for the result. Typically regulated EU enterprises under DORA / NIS2 / CRA.

See the decision layer on your own code

We run CRYPTAGION against one of your repositories in the call and produce a real CBOM, risk score and roadmap — no payment until you’ve seen it work.

Book a free discovery call →

← Resources · Home